Suppose we want to prove a proposition of the following form. In this section we will list some of the basic propositional equivalences and show how they can be used to prove other equivalences. To prove a theorem, assume that the theorem does not hold. The metaphor of a toolbox only takes you so far in mathematics. A contradiction is any statement of the form q and not q. That is, suppose that there were a largest even integer. Mathematical proofmethods of proofproof by contradiction. Urwgaramonds license and pdf documents embedding it. This method is not limited to proving just conditional statementsit can be used to prove any kind. Proof by contradiction also known as indirect proof or the method of reductio ad absurdum is a common proof technique that is based on a very simple principle. To prove something by contradiction, we assume that what we want to prove is not true, and then show that the consequences of this are not possible. Rather \point, \line, \plane and so forth are taken as unde ned terms. For many students, the method of proof by contradiction is a tremendous gift and a trojan.
Proof by contradiction often works well in proving statements of the form. A classic proof by contradiction from mathematics is the proof that the square root of 2 is irrational. Proof by contradiction in logic and mathematics is a proof that determines the truth of a statement by assuming the proposition is false, then working to show its falsity until the result of that assumption is a contradiction. Proof by contradiction is typically used to prove claims that a certain type of object cannot exist. This new method is not limited to proving just conditional statements it can be used to prove any kind of statement whatsoever. Basic proof techniques washington university in st. We started with direct proofs, and then we moved on to proofs by contradiction and mathematical induction. Many of the statements we prove have the form p q which, when negated, has the form p. They are related by certain axioms, or abstract properties that they must satisfy. Its a principle that is reminiscent of the philosophy of a certain fictional detective. Proof by contradiction ms from edexcel sample papers q1 scheme marks aos pearson progression step and progress descriptor begins the proof by assuming the opposite is true.
But there are proofs of implications by contradiction that cannot be directly rephrased into proofs by contraposition. Alternatively, you can do a proof by contradiction. A proof by contradiction usually has \suppose not or words in the beginning to alert the reader it is a proof by contradiction. Assert that a statement is false, and then prove yourself wrong. Proof methods such as proof by contradiction, or proof by induction, can lead to even more intricate loops and reversals in a mathematical argument. Proof by contradiction is typically used to prove claims that a certain type. Contradiction is also often used for proving implications, in which case it is often just direct proof of the contrapositive. A proof by contradiction is a proof that works as follows. The general steps to take when trying to prove this statement by contradiction is the following. Suppose 3 p 2 is a rational number such that 3 p 2 ab where a and b are integers having no common factor. This conditional statement being false means there exist numbers a and b for which. To prove a statement p is true, we begin by assuming p false and show that this leads to a contradiction.
This proof method is applied when the negation of the theorem statement is easier to be shown to lead to an absurd. Chapter 6 proof by contradiction mcgill university. Notes on proof by contrapositive and proof by contradiction. Since a contradiction is always false, your assumption must be false, so the original statement p must be true. To prove a statement p by contradiction, you assume the negation of what you want to prove and try to derive a contradiction usually a statement of the form. We take the negation of the given statement and suppose it to be true.
Proof by induction o there is a very systematic way to prove this. Proof by contradiction begins with the assumption that. There are three ways to prove a statement of form if a, then b. That is, the consequences contradict either what we have just assumed, or something we already know to be true or, indeed, both we call this a contradiction. Mathematics stack exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Proof by contradiction can be applied to a much broader class of statements than proof by contraposition, which only works for implications. On the analysis of indirect proofs example 1 let x be an integer. Negating the two propositions, the statement we want to prove has the form. A proof by contradiction is a method of proving a statement by assuming the hypothesis to be true and conclusion to be false, and then deriving a contradiction. For instance, suppose we want to prove if mathamath, then mathbmath.
The advantage of a proof by contradiction is that we have an additional assumption with which to work since we assume not only \p\ but also \\urcorner q\. This proof method is applied when the negation of the theorem statement is easier to be shown to lead to an absurd not true situation than to prove the original theorem statement using a. To prove a statement by contradiction, you show that the negation of the statement is impossible, or leads to a contradiction. The sum of two even numbers is not always even that would mean that there are two even numbers out there in the world somewhere thatll give us an odd number when we add them. W e now introduce a third method of proof, called proof by contradiction. Proof by contradiction is often the most natural way to prove the converse of an already proved theorem. Then may be written in the form a where a, b are integers having no factors in common. The literature refers to both methods as indirect methods of proof. Proof by contradiction relies on the simple fact that if the given theorem p is true, then. If we wanted to prove the following statement using proof by contradiction, what assumption would we start our proof with. Because the square of an odd number is odd, that in turn implies that is even.
They are called direct proof, contrapositive proof and proof by contradiction. Suppose you are given a statement that you want to prove. The method of contradiction is an example of an indirect proof. When we derive this contradiction it means that one of our assumptions was untenable. Y in the proof, youre allowed to assume x, and then show that y is true, using x. There is no integer solution to the equation x 2 5 0. Proofs using contrapositive and contradiction methods.
To prove that the statement if a, then b is true by means of direct proof, begin by assuming a is true and use this information to deduce that b is true. A read is counted each time someone views a publication summary such as the title, abstract, and list of authors, clicks on a figure, or views or downloads the fulltext. Thanks for contributing an answer to mathematics stack exchange. The converse of the pythagorean theorem the pythagorean theorem tells us that in a right triangle, there is a simple relation between the two leg lengths a and b and the hypotenuse length, c, of a right triangle. On the other hand, proof by contradiction relies on the simple fact that if the given theorem p is true, the. To prove a statement p by contradiction we start with the rst statement of. Proof by contradiction albert r meyer contradiction. The expression on the right is an integer, while the expression on the left is not an integer. These numbers cant be equal, so this is a contradiction. Theorem for every, if and is prime then is odd proof we will prove by contradiction the original statement is. Proof by contradiction on if and only if statements. But avoid asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers. If it were rational, it could be expressed as a fraction in lowest terms, where. Unfortunately, not all proposed proofs of a statement in mathematics are actually correct, and so some e ort needs to be put into veri cation of such a proposed proof.
128 1328 936 546 733 1094 427 1450 1035 1331 1146 240 192 1548 1128 956 1086 7 183 176 783 804 1595 490 1184 76 3 1164 80 654 38 841 142 946 1332 320